Ontvang nu dagelijks onze kooptips!

word abonnee
Van beleggers
voor beleggers
desktop iconMarkt Monitor

Aandeel Aegon BMG0112X1056

Laatste koers (eur) Verschil Volume
6,378   +0,008   (+0,13%) Dagrange 6,358 - 6,406 3.295.370   Gem. (3M) 4,1M

weekeinde voor herstel 6/7 augustus

292 Posts
Pagina: «« 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 ... 15 »» | Laatste | Omlaag ↓
  1. [verwijderd] 6 augustus 2011 21:39
    De Amerikaanse superbelegger Warren Buffett vindt ,,het nergens op slaan'' dat kredietbeoordelaar Standard & Poor's (S&P) de kredietwaardigheid van de Verenigde Staten heeft verlaagd.

    Berg je maar,ondek je plekje: gaat Groen.
    Eurowin: ga je niet op vakantie.!

    De gene die net op vakantie zijn en gaan zeer zuur, als je voor paar weken belegt, dure vakantie.

  2. [verwijderd] 6 augustus 2011 21:41
    quote:

    GR€€D schreef:

    Ik blijf toch met de vraag zitten of er geen voorkennis was tov de afwaardering van Amerika door de S&P.
    De beurs is eigenlijk op non nieuws naar beneden geknald.

    Mvg Greed

    Volgens moij heeft ie maandag dat al aan de beurs door gefluisterd, ga 1st maar even 5 dagen dik rood, zeebbodem maken in bloed vorm. Vrijdag beetje groen, en dan daarna zullen we in de nacht wel even voor wat Trillingen en dreunen zorgen.
  3. [verwijderd] 6 augustus 2011 21:43
    quote:

    GR€€D schreef op 6 augustus 2011 21:35:

    Ik blijf toch met de vraag zitten of er geen voorkennis was tov de afwaardering van Amerika door de S&P.
    De beurs is eigenlijk op non nieuws naar beneden geknald.

    Mvg Greed

    Wat denk je ?

    En verder :

    Het werken naar een akkoord over het schuldenplafond in de Verenigde Staten duurde te lang en veroorzaakte te veel verdeeldheid. Dat zegt de woordvoerder van het Witte Huis, Jay Carney.

    Er waren enkele miljarden mensen die dat een half jaar geleden al door hadden en die 500 sukkels niet dan ?

    Allicht wisten ze dat en hebben er gretig gebruik van gemaakt en dat muisje gaat nog een staartje krijgen.

    En de rol van China wordt binnenkort ook duidelijk, de pest is alleen dat dat volkje zo verrekt veel geduld heeft dat er een mensenleven voorbij kan gaan voordat het aan het licht komt.
  4. [verwijderd] 6 augustus 2011 22:34
    Het is al meerdere keren gezegd vandaag; niemand weet het, ook de analisten van de diverse financiele sites en tv stations niet.

    Als het sentiment maandag slecht is,gaat Aegon mee naar beneden, maar....

    Shorters zullen met Aegon maandag voorzichtiger zijn dan met andere fondsen. Het risico lijkt me gewoonweg te groot dat Aegon dinsdag met een huizenhoge gap opent als ze goede cijfers tonen over Q2. In dat geval worden de shorters onbehoorlijk gesqueezed

    Aegon staat 3 x de winst over afgelopen jaar; vroeger een kw bij aanvraag van een faillissement
    Aegon staat 4.5 x de gemiddelde verwachte winst over dit jaar. Hierin zijn de matige cijfers voor Q1 al ruimschoots ingeprijsd.

    Het EV is nog een reden om niet te ver te gaan met Aegon

    Alleen als Aegon slechte Q2 cijfers presenteerd, dan gaan we helemaal op de bietenbrug

    gr kc
  5. [verwijderd] 6 augustus 2011 23:31
    quote:

    Formule1-Fan schreef op 6 augustus 2011 23:15:

    Iedereen is in rep en roer, of het trillen en krenen van de muren door gaat in de hal van de aex.

    Denk meer een kanonskogel door de kerk naar Gap Up...............................)
    Mooie kerk trouwens !

    Die laten we dus maar even staan..........
  6. [verwijderd] 6 augustus 2011 23:45
    By LESLIE SCISM

    A handful of elite life insurers sporting triple-A credit ratings are expected to suffer a downgrade from Standard & Poor's in line with the rater's downgrade of the U.S. government Friday.

    More broadly, the rating firm's move means insurers that hold Treasurys in their investment portfolios may well end up required to set aside capital to back up those holdings.

    In mid-July, when the U.S. government was warned of possible action by S&P, the ratings firm also put the five insurers holding its coveted triple-A rating on CreditWatch negative. S&P said the move was the "downstream effect" of its action on the nation's credit rating; under S&P's criteria, a nation's rating constrains the financial-strength ratings on insurers.

    The insurers currently rated triple-A by S&P are Knights of Columbus, New York Life Insurance Co., Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Co., Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America, and United Services Automobile Association.

    In recent interviews, the companies said their financial strength justified continued triple-A ratings, and that they remain confident in the strength of their business models.

    "The Knights of Columbus has earned a rating of AAA from Standard & Poor's for 19 consecutive years, and we have every confidence in our continued success because we have a fundamentally solid business model which continues to serve us well," a Knights of Columbus spokesman said Saturday.

    "Any S&P ratings downgrade tied to the federal government would have little impact for USAA because the action is completely unrelated to our financial strength," said USAA in a statement. The insurer said it "remains exceptionally strong and is fully capable of meeting its commitments to members around the world."

    A New York Life spokesman noted earlier this summer that S&P had affirmed New York Life's AAA counterparty-credit and financial-strength ratings in April.

    "We disagree with S&P's stated view that the AAA-rated insurers should be downgraded in lockstep with the sovereign. Both Moody's and Fitch are of the opinion that the insurers can have a higher rating than the sovereign. We agree with their assessment. In fact, last month Moody's confirmed New York Life's rating of Aaa with a stable outlook, while they placed the United States on a negative outlook," said a New York Life spokesman Saturday.

    The other companies couldn't be reached immediately Saturday for comment.

    These insurers are expected to maintain their top ratings from other ratings firms that haven't downgraded the U.S.

    Almost every insurer in the U.S. would likely be touched by the downgrade of the U.S. government, because Treasurys and debt from government entities such as Fannie Mae are popular holdings in the big investment portfolios that back up customers' policies. In the life-insurance industry, such investments typically range from 10% to 15% of total holdings.

    If Treasurys fall in value, that would add to woes created by low interest rates, namely that insurers' investment income is sluggish.

    A big plus of Treasury holdings has been that insurers aren't required to hold capital to back them up, as they are with almost all other investments to protect policyholders in case the investments sour, regulators said.

    With the U.S. government now downgraded by S&P, the National Association of Insurance Commissioners—state regulators that set investment guidelines that most states adopt—would need to decide if it wants to apply a capital charge to Treasurys, and, if so, how much.

    Under current NAIC guidelines, insurers must set aside 0.4 percentage point of the amount invested in bonds rated from A-minus to triple-A if they aren't backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government, a representative of the organization of state officials said in a recent interview.

    Should that same charge apply to the roughly $244 billion in Treasurys held last year by life and property-casualty insurers, the industry would need to set aside about $1 billion for those securities.
  7. [verwijderd] 6 augustus 2011 23:50
    ROCKVILLE, Md. (MarketWatch) — After the Standard & Poor’s downgrade of U.S. debt, America now carries a rating of AA-plus instead of the coveted AAA rating on its Treasury bonds. Austria, Norway, Germany and Australia are no longer our peers ratings-wise — we are, instead, in the company of Japan, China, Spain, Taiwan and Slovenia.

    Market watchers have suspected a downgrade was in the works for a while. Not to toot my own horn, but last week in my column about five ugly truths about the debt ceiling, one of my takeaways from the deal was that a credit downgrade was in the works regardless of the fact we avoided default. Looks like my prediction, and the prediction of other financial journalists who made the same call of a credit downgrade, didn’t take long to come true. Read 5 ugly truths about the debt ceiling.

    But now that the inevitable has happened, what does it mean for the market and for individual investors?

    Interestingly enough, not much. Washington is still useless. The stock market will continue the correction that began two weeks ago. And Treasury bonds, strangely enough, will remain a safe haven for investors.
    Click to Play
    GOP hopefuls react to S&P

    Republican presidential candidates on the campaign trial in Iowa blame Obama for S&P's cut to the U.S. credit rating. Video courtesy Reuters.
    Why this doesn’t change the narrative in Washington

    S&P ain’t breaking any news here. Its reasons for the downgrade include “political brinkmanship” in Washington. “America’s governance and policymaking becoming less stable, less effective and less predictable than we previously believed,” said S&P. It went on to say $2.1 trillion in cuts “fell short” of the needed reforms. Shocking revelations, I know. Read the full story on S&P’s downgrade of the U.S. credit rating.

    While the downgrade is not to be taken lightly, it’s just a confirmation of spending problems that have been slowly eating away at the creditworthiness of America for some time. And for those of you who think this will shake our fat-cat legislators by the lapels and wake them up… well, just look at the quotes that emerged over the weekend.

    Predictably, the GOP blames the Obama administration for the downgrade — with Sen. Jim DeMint even calling for Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner’s resignation. The Democrats are pointing fingers, too, with those pesky tea party extremists to blame for everything. Read why Congress is killing jobs, not creating them, on InvestorPlace.com.

    Sorry America, but the downgrade is just the latest development in this asinine game of chicken that Congress is playing to decide the White House in 2012.
    Why this doesn’t change the stock market outlook

    And that outlook, in case you’ve been living under a rock, is ugly.

    The state of the stock market was already grim last week before the U.S. credit downgrade — and got worse after Thursday’s gut-wrenching slide that marked the worst decline since 2008. All told, we have endured an 11% rollback in the S&P 500 /quotes/zigman/3870025 SPX -0.06% across the last 11 trading days as investors headed for the hills. Read about why there will be no rally anytime soon on InvestorPlace.com.

    So the biggest question isn’t how much the S&P downgrade is going to affect the stock market on Monday, but how many dominoes will continue to fall as part of the broader crisis of confidence. The downgrade surely won’t help — but it’s just one more log thrown on the fire that is already burning pretty darn hot.
    Why this doesn’t change the safe haven status of Treasury bonds

    The U.S. credit downgrade shouldn’t have much of an impact on the perceived security Treasury bonds provide. Why? Well, consider the alternatives out there right now.

    Stocks? CDs that barely keep pace with the rate of inflation? Corporate bonds or muni bonds that rank even more poorly than the AA+ ranking Standard & Poor’s now applies to Treasuries? Not likely alternatives, any of these. Read about 6 solid picks to dumpster dive for on InvestorPlace.com.

    Investors haven’t stopped buying T-notes lately, and shouldn’t on Monday morning. Just take a look at Friday’s news that the 10-year Treasury yield dropped by the largest amount in one week since 2009. In the last month alone, yields on the 10-year note has plummeted from 3.2% to a bit over 2.3%.

    Those aren’t exactly junk-bond rates. If folks were shunning Treasuries then the government would have to entice investors with bigger yields to offset the perception of bigger risks. Yes, the downgrade means that T-notes are riskier than they were before. But relatively, they are a much safer bet in the minds of many investors considering this difficult economic environment.
  8. forum rang 7 mvliex 1 6 augustus 2011 23:52
    quote:

    knife catcher schreef op 6 augustus 2011 22:34:

    Het is al meerdere keren gezegd vandaag; niemand weet het, ook de analisten van de diverse financiele sites en tv stations niet.

    Als het sentiment maandag slecht is,gaat Aegon mee naar beneden, maar....

    Shorters zullen met Aegon maandag voorzichtiger zijn dan met andere fondsen. Het risico lijkt me gewoonweg te groot dat Aegon dinsdag met een huizenhoge gap opent als ze goede cijfers tonen over Q2. In dat geval worden de shorters onbehoorlijk gesqueezed

    Aegon staat 3 x de winst over afgelopen jaar; vroeger een kw bij aanvraag van een faillissement
    Aegon staat 4.5 x de gemiddelde verwachte winst over dit jaar. Hierin zijn de matige cijfers voor Q1 al ruimschoots ingeprijsd.

    Het EV is nog een reden om niet te ver te gaan met Aegon

    Alleen als Aegon slechte Q2 cijfers presenteerd, dan gaan we helemaal op de bietenbrug

    gr kc
    Komt men eerder met de cijfers dan????
    ;-)
  9. Marconosto 7 augustus 2011 09:01
    quote:

    Formule1-Fan schreef op 7 augustus 2011 08:49:

    DE aex opend boven de 510 dat waren nog eens tijden.
    Tegen de tijd dat dat weer gebeurt zitten we ws dicht tegen ons pensioen. En sommige ws al er overheen.
    Goedemorgen allen. Lekker geslapen? Ik niet, beroerd maar hoort erbij.
    gr MCN
292 Posts
Pagina: «« 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 ... 15 »» | Laatste |Omhoog ↑

Meedoen aan de discussie?

Word nu gratis lid of log in met je emailadres en wachtwoord.